New rule: Correspondence should be reciprocated in the original medium unless another medium is explicitly requested.
Example: If I send you an email, don’t call me.
New rule: Correspondence should be reciprocated in the original medium unless another medium is explicitly requested.
Example: If I send you an email, don’t call me.
While applying online for the Canada Child Tax Benefit program, my application was stopped and I was presented with this message:
Unfortunately, you cannot use the Apply for child benefits online service because there is a female parent in the same home.
For Canada Child Tax Benefit (CCTB) purposes, there is a presumption that when both a male and female parent live in the same home as the child, the female parent is considered to be primarily responsible for the child and should apply. However, if the male parent is primarily responsible, he can apply if a signed note from the female parent is attached to the application which states that the male parent is primarily responsible for the child(ren).
My best guess as to why this might be required would be to ensure that the benefit makes it to the women and children in homes where evil men might withhold it. I hope I’m wrong about that, because it’s horrying to think that this might be necessary.
The Conservative Party of Canada (who still deserve credit for dropping the “Progressive” from their name) deserve a heaping dollop of shame for threatening to boycott the televised leadership debates if the Green Party was included. Shame on the other leaders and the media for letting it happen.
During a report on the local TV news program about sex education in schools, one high-school student was asked what they had been taught about sex. “Mostly absenteeism,” she replied.
I guess you can’t get pregnant if you don’t even show up.